EIO-LCA Web Forum

A support and discussion resource for users of the website
It is currently Sat Sep 26, 2020 7:40 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 10:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 8:28 am
Posts: 2
Hello,

If I wanted to determine the life-cycle water-use impacts of consumer expenditures on beef (for example), should I sum the impacts of the two IO categories for (1) Cattle Ranching and Farming and (2) Animal (except poultry) slaughtering and processing? Or would this be double counting? In other words, what are the system boundaries and inclusions for animal slaughtering? I assume it does not include the cattle ranching since that is its own IO category?

Also, after converting from consumer expenditures to producer prices (using BEA markups), how can I allocate the fraction of the money that would go to the cattle ranching sector versus the animal slaughtering sector, if the known monetary value is final expenditures on beef?

Thank you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 9:52 am 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2005 1:01 pm
Posts: 90
Ecohen:

No, the whole point of a supply chain based model (like EIO-LCA) is that it by default includes all the upstream supply chain effects.

Thus if you run the model for beef production, it automatically includes the grazing/raising of the cattle. you can see the results of that row's activity in the results. Thus, to find the water use related to grain production, grazing, and slaughtering just look in each of those rows in the results.

Also note that based on your data, you might want to be using the purchaser price model (in which you could input the raw dollars of consumer expenditures for your sector of interest).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: re: Double Counting
PostPosted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 8:28 am
Posts: 2
I see what you mean now regarding the upstream inclusions; thank you for the clarification. On your second point, I agree that using the Purchaser Price Model would be preferable since I have consumer expenditure data, but [i]water use[/i] is not included in the 2002 or 1997 Purchaser Price Model--as far as I can tell when I run the tool. Perhaps this will be added soon?

Thanks,
Elliot


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:12 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2005 1:01 pm
Posts: 90
Sorry for misunderstanding part of your question. We have no plans for updating water data for 1997 - there are no relevant data sources.

The lack of water data in the 2002 purchaser model is an oversight. We will fix that ASAP!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 7:06 am 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2005 1:01 pm
Posts: 90
Water vector has been posted for the 2002 purchaser model! Thanks for pointing this out, Elliot.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group